Legal Opinion

MICHAEL ABEL ET AL. v. CELESTE M. JOHNSON

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 20, 2021No. SC 20436Published

1Opinion of the Court

Page 128 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL December 14, 2021 240 DECEMBER, 2021

340 Conn. 240

Abel v. Johnson MICHAEL ABEL ET AL. v. CELESTE M. JOHNSON (SC 20436) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff property owners sought to enjoin the defendant, who owned abutting property on which she operated a landscaping business, from violating a restrictive covenant that limited the use of the defendant’s property to residential purposes only. The restrictive covenant was contained in a 1956 deed by which the original grantors conveyed a tract of real property to a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wahrendorff v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API