Legal Opinion

Silbermann v. Morton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented by the first appeal is the propriety of adding to the order of June 17, 1947, the additional decretals in question after this court had affirmed that order. No review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of the action of the examiners on the examination had for training and experience is presented by this appeal.

Petitioner, in her application for the prior order of June 17, 1947, asked that the commission be directed “ to permit me to take said examination on the same basis as the other qualified applicants.” The examination has three parts: (1) written; (2)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Hansen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Miltenberg & Samton, Inc. v. FalkinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Meldon v. DevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Kanen v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schlossberg v. SchlossbergNew York City Family Court · 1970
  2. Gerity v. BronsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Silbermann v. McNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API