Legal Opinion

Kanen v. Kern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The municipal civil service commission of ¿he . city of New York admitted the petitioner to a promotion examination held for the position of engineer (safety), grade 4.

*501The petitioner was employed in the board of water supply as an engineering inspector. The new position was created to secure men to initiate and develop safety measures in connection with the work of constructing the new Delaware Water Supply Tunnel to be built by the city of New York. The estimated cost of the tunnel is $300,000,000. An average of 6,000 persons will be employed weekly on the project. The tunnel will be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Bridgman v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mallen v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Silbermann v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. People Ex Rel. Latimer v. Board of Education of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API