Legal Opinion

Shurte v. Fletcher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Cass; Coolidge, J. Bill by William Sbtirte against Sarepta Fletcher and others to set aside certain conveyances made in settlement •of an estate, for a partition of the real estate, and for other relief. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The complainant filed a bill in chancery, alleging that his father, Isaac Shurte, at the time of his death, held the legal title to 546 acres of land, worth $30,-000; that he died March 2, 1886, intestate, leaving a widow, five children, and several grandchildren by a deceased child; that the widow, Mary Shurte, died in January, 1892, intestate, and that each of the children of Isaac Shurte became seised in fee of one-sixth of said real estate; that, at the time of the death of the widow of Isaac Shurte, there were two great grandchildren, Bertha Van Riper and Flora Van Riper, who were under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bush v. MerrimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Perkins v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bean v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Raseman v. RasemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Garvin v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API