Legal Opinion

Garvin v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1908No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Macomb; Erskine, J. Assumpsit by Kate Garvin against Kittie G. Stone on an agreement for the payment of certain moneys. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This suit was instituted in justice’s court by the widow of Jay Garvin, who died intestate March 16, 1905, against Kittie G. Stone, his daughter, who, with her brother, Leon E. Garvin, comprised his surviving heirs at law. The declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit with notice “ that this action is based on a certain written instrument, a copy of which is hereto attached.” A bill of particulars was filed, as follows:

“$110.00. due and owing the plaintiff under and by virtue of a certain agreement made and executed by the defendant and her brother, Leon E. Garvin, on or about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bean v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hull v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mitchell v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Porter v. LeacheMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Shurte v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hansbarger v. HansbargerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Campbell v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Estate of MeredithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API