Taylor v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentCox, Circuit Judge
My guess is that the Georgia Supreme Court would decide this case the same way today’s court decides it. The result is certainly equitable. A decision to certify a question of state law to the supreme court of that state is a discretionary one, Escareno v. Noltina Crucible & Refractory Corp., 139 F.3d 1456, 1461 (11th Cir.1998), but in my view a proper exercise of our discretion in this case requires certification. Aong the way to reaching the result the court reaches today it overrules sub silen-tio some Georgia precedent and decides an important question of Georgia law.
Today’s decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massaline v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Alejandro Escareno v. Noltina Crucible and Refractory Corporation, Carl Nolte Sohne GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- McCroskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Rolland v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.