Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2006No. S06A1632PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLEY, Justice.

After being convicted of several counts of burglary and other charges in 2003, James Rolland filed a verified petition for writ of habeas corpus in 2005. The sole ground of the petition reads as follows: “The petitioner asserts that his trial counsel . . . rendered ineffective assistance ... by abandoning the case, without filing a motion for new trial and notice of appeal after being informed by petitioner.” Rolland subsequently filed a brief with an attached letter from the clerk of the trial court stating that Rolland’s trial attorney did not file a motion for new trial or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Ponder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  4. Gaither v. GibbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Foskey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sherman v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Peach Blossom Development Co. v. Lowe Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Phagan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Nguyen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Parham v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API