Legal Opinion

State v. Eddy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. Jesse Eddy appeals from conviction of robbery.

1Opinion of the Court · MooreJustice Moore

The defendant Jesse Eddy was jointly tried and convicted with J ames Winkle of the crime of robbery, upon an indictment, the charging part of which is as follows:

“They, the said Jesse' Eddy and James Winkle, on the 24th day of February, A. D. 1905, in the County of Lane and the State of Oregon then and there being and then and there acting together, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously take from the person of William Dompire one ten-dollar gold coin, two one-dollar silver coins and four one-half-dollar silver coins, all of the said coins being then and there lawful money of the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Moore.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WintzingerodeOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  3. State v. DodsonOregon Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State v. Ah LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. DilleyOregon Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. HosmerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. State v. MimsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. ParrOregon Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API