Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Martofel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 2002PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.

¶ 1 Cynthia Johnson (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to stay or set aside a writ of possession for real property on which she resided. The trial court found itself without sufficient time to consider the motion prior to the sheriffs execution of the writ and, therefore, it did not rule on the motion until after execution of the writ. Consequently, the court found that the issue was moot and, furthermore, that the property’s owner, John Martofel (Appellee), was entitled to the writ of possession. Johnson claims that the trial court erred in so determining.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Faden v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Graziano Const. Co., Inc. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In Re Estate of DoroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Smith v. CoyneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. In re W.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API