Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Peters
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 17, 1998No. 98C3247PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
Gwendolyn Hicks, on behalf of herself and other similarly situated plaintiffs, seeks a permanent injunction against the enforcement of Illinois Public Aid Code’s multi-ti-ered durational residency requirement (“the Illinois durational residency requirement”). 305 ILCS 5/11-30. 1 Hicks says that this state legislation violates her constitutional right to travel or migrate from Alabama to Illinois, that the law is not based on any compelling or rational state interest, and that it is prohibited by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maldonado v. HoustounCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees v. Diversified Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Diamond Blade Warehouse, Inc. v. Paramount Diamond Tools, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- CFM Majestic, Inc. v. NHC, INC.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.