Legal Opinion

CFM Majestic, Inc. v. NHC, INC.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 15, 2000No. 3:99-cv-00120PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought by CFM Majestic, Inc. (“CFM”) for infringement of CFM’s federally registered trademark, VERMONT CASTINGS (“VERMONT CASTINGS”), under Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, Unfair Competition under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and state and common law unfair competition, by reason of NHC, Inc.’s (“NHC”) use in commerce of the name “VermontHearth.”

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331; 15…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Centaur Communications, Limited v. A/s/m Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  2. Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API