Legal Opinion

Jensen Can-Filling Mach. Co. v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1895No. 134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. This was a bill in equity by Edwin Horton and Oliver W. Horton against the Jensen Can-Pilling Machine Company, Mathias Jensen, and John Pox, for infringement of certain patents. The circuit court dismissed the bill, as to said Pox, and granted an injunction against the remaining defendants. The latter appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity commenced 'in the United States circuit court for the district of Oregon by the appellees against the appellants and one John Pox, for alleged infringements of the following United States patents, viz.: No. 250,096, to Edwin Horton, granted Hovember 29, 1881, on machine for soldering side seams of cans. No. 250,266, to P. M. Leavitt, granted Hovember 29, 1881, on machine, for making the seams of sheet-metal cans. No. 366,482, granted to W. Hipperling, July 12, *2371887, on apparatus for the manufacture of tin cans. No 395,788, to P. M. Leavitt…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Norton v. San Jose Fruit-Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  3. American Can Co. v. Hickmott Asparagus Canning Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API