Salisbury v. Chadbourne
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Plaintiff, as grantee of Abram Helms, by deed dated October 20, 1874, of his interest in the lands described in the foregoing case, brought this action to redeem from the deed to Gross & March of October, 1859, with oral defeasance, described in that case.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Plaintiff, as grantee of Abram Helms, by deed dated October 20, 1874, of his interest in the lands described in the foregoing case, brought this action to redeem from the deed to Gross & March of October, 1859, with oral defeasance, described in that case. The facts found by the court as to service of summons upon Abram ITelms and wife in the foreclosure action brought by Gross & March against them and others, are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The other essential facts are stated in the report of the preceding case. The circuit court…
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
I. The appellant founds his right to redeem an undivided half of the lands on the conveyance which was made and delivered to him by Abram Helms and wife on the 20th day of October, 1874. The circuit court found that Abram Helms and wife were personally served with process in the action commenced by Gross & March, in 1863, to bar their rights in the mortgaged premises. As a matter of course, if they were thus served with process, they were concluded by the judgment in the action, and no longer had any interest in the premises to convey to the plaintiff. ¥e think the finding of the court as to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salter v. HilgenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stone v. Little Yellow Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Voelz v. VoelzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Knutson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Kretsinger v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Osborn v. DobrinzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893