Legal Opinion

Talucci v. Archambault

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1969No. Docket 5,360PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

This is plaintiff’s appeal from an order of summary judgment entered on the pleadings in circuit court in defendants’ favor. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), were based on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Since the only issue for our determination is the sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint to state • a claim, we accept as true every well-pleaded allegation in plaintiff’s complaint. Bielski v. Wolverine Insurance Co. (1967), 379 Mich 280. So considered, we find the following to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hart v. LudwigMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bielski v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McMillan v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Osman v. Summer Green Lawn Care, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Sharon Proos Kosters v. The Seven-Up Company, & Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API