Florida House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentCanady, J.
Because the Florida Constitution in article III, section 16(d), unambiguously precludes challenges under Florida law to a legislative redistricting plan that has been declared valid by this Court in a proceeding under article III, section 16, I would grant the Legislature’s request for relief under this Court’s authority-granted by article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution-to issue all writs necessary to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction. I strongly disagree with the majority’s decision, which consigns section 16(d) to the status of a dead letter. Accordingly, I dissent.
Ar…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Horn & Hardart Company v. National Rail Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Nunn v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- McCann v. KernerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.