Legal Opinion · Dissent

Florida House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 11, 2013No. SC13-252Published

1DissentCanady, J.

Because the Florida Constitution in article III, section 16(d), unambiguously precludes challenges under Florida law to a legislative redistricting plan that has been declared valid by this Court in a proceeding under article III, section 16, I would grant the Legislature’s request for relief under this Court’s authority-granted by article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution-to issue all writs necessary to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction. I strongly disagree with the majority’s decision, which consigns section 16(d) to the status of a dead letter. Accordingly, I dissent.

Ar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Horn & Hardart Company v. National Rail Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Nunn v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. McCann v. KernerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API