Legal Opinion
H. F. Walliser & Co. v. F. W. Maurer & Sons Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 1927No. 3019PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
This suit was brought by H. P. Walliser & Co., as assignee of Clarence P Arnold, for infringement of letters patent No. 1,390,267, for which application was filed November 30, 1920, and patent issued and assignment made September 13, 1921, for a machine for making and applying tufts. After the hearing, ■one Joseph Chappatte, on December 23, 1926, was substituted as plaintiff and filed a supplemental bill of complaint.
The machine forming the subject-matter of the patent in suit is (1) for making tufts or balls of a tassel-like nature out of a bundle "of threads; and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Withington-Cooley Manuf'g Co. v. KinneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Dunkley Co. v. California Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Beecroft & Blackman, Inc. v. KooneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- McKinnon Chain Co. v. American Chain Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Max C. McElmurry and White River Technologies, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Company, Entergy Corporation and Middle South UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Flannery Bolt Co. v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- California Packing Corp. v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of CaliforniaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933