Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Kroll, Pomerantz and Cameron
Montana Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1986No. 86-001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison
Samuel and Rita Jackson (Jacksons), sued defendant, Kroll, Pomerantz, and Cameron, (Kroll), a law firm with its principal place of business in New York, alleging conspiracy and violation of the Montana Insurance Unfair Trade Practices Act. Kroll moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Following a hearing, the Eighteenth Judicial District Court granted Kroll’s motion and dismissed the complaint. This appeal follows.
Jacksons purchased residential property in Belgrade, Montana. The property had been listed with Realty World Land Office. Elizabeth McNeal, a sales agent for Realty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Simmons v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Walter J. Taubler v. Robert Giraud and Philippe GiraudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Willson v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Gould v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. The Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Simmons Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. San Joaquin HelicoptersMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of Estate of DuceyMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.