Legal Opinion
Bustamante v. Tuliano
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 6, 1991PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 492 (1991)
591 A.2d 694
RAUL E. BUSTAMANTE AND YOLANDA BUSTAMANTE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
PAUL TULIANO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND EDWARD CARMEN, WILLIAM HANN, BUD FIFIELD, AND JOHN DOE(S), FICTITIOUS NAME(S), DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 10, 1991.
Decided June 6, 1991.
Before Judges KING, LONG and STERN.
Robert B. Kugler argued the cause for appellant (Moss, Powers & Kugler, attorneys; Robert B. Kugler, on the brief).
Philip T. Ciprietti argued the cause for respondents…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Bryan v. JeffersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tolliver v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Khair v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Kristiansen v. MorganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Elaine J. Subbe-Hirt v. Robert Baccigalupi Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- NJ Mfrs. Ins. v. Joseph Oat Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.