Legal Opinion

Archer v. Aetna Casualty Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 6, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This is an action of debt on a replevin bond brought by Woodrow Archer against the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Ida Korhonen. The case was tried before a jury. It comes to the Law Court upon exceptions to the refusal of the presiding justice to direct a verdict for the defendants. The exceptions are overruled.

The evidence shows that on August 7, 1945 Ida Korhonen commenced an action of replevin against this plaintiff, Woodrow Archer, and took from him “one 1941 Mercury Club Coupe.” The replevin bond, required by R. S. 1944, Chap. 112, Sec. 10, signed by these defendants, Ida Korhonen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Wellington v. Inhabitants of CorinnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  2. Howe v. HoudeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Washington Ice Co. v. WebsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
  4. Pettygrove v. HoytSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833
  5. Tuck v. MosesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacLean v. JackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  2. Production Credit Ass'n v. KentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  3. Martin v. DeschaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  4. Child's Play Ltd. v. A & A, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API