Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Tanner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 5, 2013No. 12-2503UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

Suspended attorney Jeffrey Pearson and disbarred attorney Allen Feingold (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their declaratory judgment action against their former clients, Theresa and Jerry Allen; the Allens’ current lawyer, Mark Tanner; and Mr. Tanner’s firm, Feldman, Shepherd, Wohgelhertner, Tanner, Weinstock & Dodig, LLP. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are entitled to recover, in quantum meruit, the reasonable value of legal services provided to the Allens before Plaintiffs’ suspension and disbarment. We will affirm.

I.Background 1

In…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Comp., D/B/A Allegheny Power Allegheny Power System, Incorporated Duquesne Light Company Dqe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re ThorpeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API