Legal Opinion

People v. Berger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges VaN Vookhis, Burke, Scileppi, BergaN and KeatiNG. Chief Judge DesmoNd and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the electronic eavesdrops inside two offices, one of which was a law office, were unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment as a physical intrusion into private premises and as a “ general search ” for evidence. (See Siegel v. People, 16 N Y 2d 330, 333, per Desmond, Ch. J. [dissenting]; People v. McCall, 17 N Y 2d 152, 161, per Desmond, Ch. J. [concurring]; People v. Grossman, 45 Misc 2d 557; cf. Stanford v. Texas,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API