Legal Opinion

In Re the Adoption of SCD

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 2004No. 03-1283PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

In this adoption case, we are called upon ice. under what circumstances it is necessary to obtain the consent of a putative father before a child can be adopted pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-206 (Repl. 2002). The record has been filed under seal, and we refer to the parties by their initials: IT is the mother of the child placed for adoption; the KDs, from Albuquerque, New Mexico, are married and are seeking to adopt the baby; and TF is the putative father, who, prior to the baby’s birth, registered as the baby’s father under the Arkansas Putative Father Registry on May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. R.N. v. J.M.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Dixon v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Greenhough v. GoforthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hall v. Hubco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Vick v. CecilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. In Re Adoption of AmcSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Escobedo v. NickitaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. In re Adoption of Baby Boy B.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API