Legal Opinion

R.N. v. J.M.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 2001No. 01-174PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J IM HANNAH, Justice.

Appellant R.N. appeals the decision of the Craighead County Chancery Court1 denying his petition to establish paternity of a minor child, A.M., who was born to Appellee J.M. during her marriage to Appellee B.M. J.M. and B.M. are still married. In this appeal, we are asked to interpret and harmonize Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-10-104 (Repl. 1998 and Supp. 2001), 9-10-108 (Repl. 1998 and Supp. 2001), and 16-43-901 (Repl. 1999), which deal with the estabhshment of paternity.

The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. J.M. and B.M. were married in 1992 and are still married.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Donoho v. DonohoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Stivers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Brewer v. FergusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation Commission v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Kinchen v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API