Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Heidman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1923No. 23,526PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

At about 7:30 a. m. on July 30, 1922, plaintiff was struck and seriously injured by a Ford truck driven by defendant. Charging defendant with negligence in the operation of the truck, he brought this action and recovered a verdict, and defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.

At the time of the accident respondent was a night telegraph operator employed in the office of the News Tribune in the city of *130Dulúth. He worked until about 1 a. m. on July 30, then played cards until about 7 a. m. when he left the office to go home.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stallman v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Johnson v. BrastadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Allen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Torkelson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Anderson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Tobisch v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API