Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 2009No. A08-2169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

Petitioners Norm Coleman, Cullen Shee-han, and Cara Beth Lindell filed a petition and an amended petition pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2008) concerning the November 4, 2008, election for United States Senator from the State of Minnesota. Petitioners asked the court to order, among other things, that no rejected absentee ballots be counted in the administrative recount then underway and that all issues related to such ballots be raised, if at all, in an election contest under Minn. Stat. ch. 209 (2008). After expedited briefing, the court heard oral argument on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carden v. SpilmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  2. O'Ferrall v. ColbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  3. Moon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Rolvaag v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Hunt v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. KSTP-TV v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Carlson v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Begin v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. KSTP-TV v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Timothy King v. Gretchen WhitmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API