Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Selsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 19, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized possession of a controlled substance. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the detailed misbehavior report, the testimony of correction officers and supporting documentation which confirmed that a random search of petitioner’s cell had resulted in the discovery of a substance subsequently identified by laboratory testing as marihuana (see Matter of Laureano v Senkowski, 277 AD2d 613; Matter of Rivera v Goord, 261 AD2d 754). Testimony…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roman v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Bolling v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rivera v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Laureano v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Brown v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diaz v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Chapman v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Markou v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Perez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003