Chapman v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*945The detailed misbehavior report, related memoranda and testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing a weapon and smuggling (see Matter of Wilson v Goord, 47 AD3d 1102, 1102 [2008]; Matter of Dexter v Goord, 43 AD3d 516, 517 [2007]). Petitioner’s suggestion that the weapon could have been planted in the contraband watch room prior to his arrival created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Wilson v Goord, supra; Matter of Yancey v Conway, 46 AD3d 1042 [2007]). Although no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roman v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wilson v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Dexter v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yancey v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Anderson v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McFadden v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Batts v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Gonzalez v. VenettozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Tenney v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- MatterofMcFaddenvPrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.