Legal Opinion

MD Associates v. Friedman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 1990No. 4-86-2841PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLEN, Judge.

Appellants were prospective real estate buyers and appellees Reichbach were real estate brokers hired by appellants in their search for a house. Appellees Friedman are not involved in this appeal.

Appellants brought suit against Friedman and Reichbach for specific performance and damages for intentional interference with a contractual relationship and negligence. The jury returned a verdict against Friedman for $23,600.00 for tor-tious interference and against Mrs. Reich-bach for negligence. The jury found for Mr. Reichbach on the negligence count. The trial court ordered a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Lake Gateway Motor Inn, Inc. v. MATT'S SUNSHINE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Landry v. HornsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Diamond v. RosenfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. MD Associates v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Telephone Operating Systems, Inc. v. Peoples Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
  2. Watson Construction Co. v. City of GainesvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API