Legal Opinion

Hunkin Conkey Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1972No. 170-70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDueeee, Senior Judge

Plaintiff, the Hunkin Conkey Construction Company [hereinafter referred to as either the contractor or plaintiff], entered into Contract No. DA-36-058-CIVENG-62-109 on October 16, 1961 with the United States, acting through the Army Corps of Engineers. The contract provided, inter alia, that the contractor would furnish all labor, materials and equipment, except for certain Government-furnished property, and perform all work necessary for the construction of Kinuza Dam, to be located on the Allegheny River in northern Pennsylvania.

During performance of the contract, it was discovered that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Brock & Blevins Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. John A. Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Dittmore-Freimuth Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles F. Day & Associates LLCArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2018
  2. North American Landscaping, Construction and Dredge, Co., Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2018
  3. Watts Constructors, LLCArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API