Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Security & Trust Co. v. Frost

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 25, 1940No. 7481Published

1DissentRutledge, Associate Justice

The question is whether the testatrix intended by Item Eleventh to confer upon her trustees a narrowly limited discretion to decide only unsettled legal questions or, on the contrary, to give them a broader and more discretionary power which would permit them, to some extent, to distribute as income what would otherwise go as principal and vice versa. I think the latter was her expressed wish, from the language of the clause, its context in Item Eleventh and the will as a whole, the circumstances in which it was executed, the purposes the testatrix had in mind, and the more nearly applicable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dumaine v. DumaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. In Re the Will of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Chase National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API