American Security & Trust Co. v. Frost
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentRutledge, Associate Justice
The question is whether the testatrix intended by Item Eleventh to confer upon her trustees a narrowly limited discretion to decide only unsettled legal questions or, on the contrary, to give them a broader and more discretionary power which would permit them, to some extent, to distribute as income what would otherwise go as principal and vice versa. I think the latter was her expressed wish, from the language of the clause, its context in Item Eleventh and the will as a whole, the circumstances in which it was executed, the purposes the testatrix had in mind, and the more nearly applicable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dumaine v. DumaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- In Re the Will of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Chase National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.