Legal Opinion

Jones v. Moores

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. ' Action by Howard S. Jones against Robert L. Moores and others to foreclose a mechanic's lien. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff agreed with the defendants to furnish embossed, cut, and ground glass to be set and furnished in the defendants’ houses. By the terms of the agreement, when the work and materials were properly set and furnished; the defendants were to give their promissory note for the same, three months from the date thereof. On the 20th of January, 1891, the work was completed to the satisfac*54tian of defendants, and was accepted by them. On the 12th of January, 1891, the defendants gave the plaintiff a note for $500, at three months from date, and on the 21st of January, 1891, they gave the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. King v. . GreenwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Mott v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woolf v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Holl v. LongNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Miller v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Friedman v. LowensteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  5. Woolf v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API