Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Fish

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1921No. Civ. No. 3964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSturteyant, J.

The plaintiffs, as husband and wife, brought an action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff wife in an automobile accident. The plaintiffs recovered a judgment and the defendants have appealed under the new method.

In the charging part of their complaint, the plaintiffs aver that at the time of the accident they were traveling in a Ford sedan in the public road leading from San Jose to Oakland; that the defendants were operating a certain automobile bus; that at the time of the accident the defendants so carelessly, negligently, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Karr v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Shupe v. RodolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wiley v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Freitas v. PasserinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API