Purdue Pharma, L.P. v. Oregon Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Office of Medical Assistance Programs
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Petitioners Purdue Pharma, L.P., and the Purdue Frederick Company seek judicial review pursuant to ORS 183.400 of an amended Department of Human Services (DHS) administrative rule that lists drugs that are approved for reimbursement by the state for clients of the Oregon Health Plan. Petitioners contend that the amended rule was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures and exceeded the statutory authority of DHS. We conclude that DHS complied with applicable procedures and did not exceed its authority in adopting the amended rule and therefore uphold its validity.
I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- School District No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeLeon, Inc. v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Oregon Restaurant Services, Inc. v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Coats-Sellers v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006