Legal Opinion

Roseberry v. Home Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1935No. Appeal, 179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The defendant insurance company on May 16, 1927, issued an industrial policy of insurance on the life of Margaret Roseberry, payable to Charles Roseberry, her husband, as beneficiary. The contract of insurance was made in consideration of the delivery of the policy during the lifetime and good health of the insured and “the payment of the weekly premium hereinbefore stated [22 cents] to the Company or to its authorized representative on or before every Monday during the continuance of this contract, until the seventy-fifth birthday of the Insured.” Margaret Roseberry died…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Ryan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Corrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Battle, Admrx. v. Prud. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API