Legal Opinion

Easterling v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 21, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Appellant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and asks a reversal on several grounds.

Though the indictment charged several offenses, the demurrer thereto1 was properly overruled when the Commonwealth elected to try appellant on the charge of transporting intoxicating liquor.

When the case was called for trial, it developed that Pat Caudill, whose name was endorsed on the indictment as one of the witnesses for the Commonwealth, was not present. Appellant then filed an affidavit for a continuance on account of Caudill’s absence, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Stokes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hudson and Walker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Combest v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Stokes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API