Legal Opinion
Young v. Williams
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 1992No. 19188PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a district court’s imposition of sanctions under LR.C.P. 11 against Roger Williams, the attorney for the plaintiffs in an action for a prescriptive easement. Following the plaintiffs’ presentation of evidence, the court granted a motion for an involuntary dismissal and awarded attorney fees and costs against the plaintiffs. On its own initiative, the court imposed sanctions against Williams pursuant to I.R.C.P. 11. Williams appeals from this portion of the judgment arguing that Rule 11 sanctions were not appropriate in this case. We affirm.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Avirgan v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. KildewIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. ObendorffIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. ObendorffIdaho Supreme Court · 1998