United States v. Richard Allen Stossel
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Nine years after his original conviction, federal prisoner Richard Allen Stossel appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his post-conviction motion for reduction of sentence filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b)(3). He alleges the district court improperly calculated the sentencing guidelines, which resulted in “duplicative counting” and an improper two-level enhancement. The Government argues the district court lacked jurisdiction over Appellant’s motion because § 3582(b)(3) does not authorize district courts to modify sentences.
We review whether a court has jurisdiction as a question of law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Don Newcombe BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Andre Pease, a.k.a., Magic, Beverly Reedy, Latoya PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BallingerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Jose Miguel CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Oral Roger RussellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Karl Bernard BellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Curtis CastraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Tracy Topaz TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.