Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Batson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 12, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The appellant is O. E. Tanner, defendant in the court below in a foreclosure suit in which final decree was entered against her after decree pro confesso had been duly entered for failure to appear, plead or to otherwise answer the bill of complaint.

The appellant propounds' three questions, which by her solicitors she asserts are to be determined here, as follows:

“First. May a final decree of foreclosure o.f mortgage securing payment of- a note be properly entered in favor of an alleged endorsee of the note without either production of the original note before the Chancellor or a satisfactory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. BaynardSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Williams v. PhielSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bridier v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Barber v. EhrichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Cleveland Mortgage & Investment Co. v. GageSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. McCann v. City of St. Petersburg Ex Rel. LelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. DATA LEASE FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. BaradSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API