Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1926No. 5403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

We are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by • the evidence in the case. The property embraced in the year’s support which had been duly set aside to Mrs. Patterson and her minor children was taken from the estate of Mrs. Patterson’s first husband, Newton. It was set aside for the support of herself and her minor children. After her second marriage she continued to live on the land, and was living there and being supported from the crops grown on the land when the debt upon which the fi. fa. levied upon these lands was created. The debts were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swain v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Ragan v. ShiverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Hines v. LavantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Anders v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Whitfield v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Jones v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API