White v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is robbery; the punishment, ninety-nine (99) years.
Appellant’s court appointed attorney has filed a brief stating that he has carefully reviewed the record and concludes the appeal is wholly without merit. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137 (1969), he submits one contention which might arguably be raised on appeal. See also Woods v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 487 S.W.2d 344; Hicks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 670; Sasueda v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Sasueda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972