Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kimball

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. In the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge, presiding. Declaration on. promissory note; judgment by default; error by defendant. Heal'd in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The defendant in error sued upon two promissory, notes, both in one count of the declaration, one of which was a general promise to pay, not saying when. The declaration concludes,“ by means whereof, the defendant then and there became liable to the plaintiff to pay the amount of said notes, according to the tenor and effect of said notes, and being so liable, in consideration thereof, then and there promised the plaintiff to pay him said amounts, according to the tenor and effect of said notes.

Tet the defendant has not paid to the plaintiff the amounts of said several promissory notes, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stratton v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Chittick v. Town of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  2. Sehnert v. Schipper & Block, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Brown v. AtwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  4. Knickerbocker v. Fort Dearborn Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  5. Hippach v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API