Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker v. Fort Dearborn Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1920No. Gen. No. 25,545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Wells M. Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

Kate E. Knickerbocker, the plaintiff, having commenced in the municipal court of Chicago an action of the first class in contract against the defendant, Fort Dearborn Trust & Savings Bank, she, on December 24,1918, filed a second amended statement of claim, in which the averments were, in substance, as follows:

That (1) on or about December 1,1913, the Southern Illinois & St. Louis Railway Company, a corporation, duly executed a certain “mortgage deed of trust,” by which it purported to convey to the def endant, as trustee, a large amount of real and personal property, rights, contracts,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ainsa v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Boyles v. ChytrausIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Herbert S. Gilbert & Co. v. McGinnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Garrity v. LozanoIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Bauernschmidt v. Maryland Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Corp. v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. City Trust & Savings Bank v. City of KankakeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API