Legal Opinion

Black & Black Oil Co. v. Smith Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 14, 1986No. 86-63PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant, Black and Black Oil Company, (Black and Black), entered a contract with the appellee, Guy R. Smith Drilling Company, Inc., (Smith), by which Black and Black hired Smith to drill a well. After the drilling had begun, the drilling ceased because circulation of the drilling mud, which is necessary to the drilling operation, was lost. Another company, Dia-Log, was called to the scene to restore the lost circulation. Dia-Log sued Black and Black as well as Smith to collect the amount it had billed for the service it rendered. Black and Black claimed Smith was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. & A. Construction Co. v. Benning Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Wasp Oil, Inc. v. Arkansas Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Fort Smith Appliance & Service Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Don Gilstrap Builders, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. McDermott v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. American Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Looper v. Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc. v. Anderson-Martin MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Pingel v. Troy & Nichols, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc. v. Anderson-Martin MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API