Fort Smith Appliance & Service Co. v. Smith

This case grows out of a.11 agreement which the appellant, plaintiff in the Circuit Court, claims is a conditional sales contract, and appellee contends is a consignment. The jury found for appellee.

Appellant urges as errors the giving by the court of instruction No. 4 requested by appellee and the refusal to give instruction No. 12 requested by appellant. The contract involved is as follows:

“CONSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

“This agreement made and entered into this the 25th day of September, 1947, by and between Port Smith Appliance & Service Company, hereinafter referred to as the consignor,' and Jim…