Legal Opinion

Schenk v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 30, 1976No. Docket No. 1249-75UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petitioner executed a special consent (Form 872-A) extending the period of limitation on assessment but altered it by providing that the consent would terminate upon notice by him to the Commissioner. Petitioner did not attempt to mislead the Internal Revenue Service. An appellate conferee accepted the consent on behalf of of the consent and a statutory notice was subsequently mailed to petitioner.

Read the full summary

Petitioner executed a special consent (Form 872-A) extending the period of limitation on assessment but altered it by providing that the consent would terminate upon notice by him to the Commissioner. Petitioner did not attempt to mislead the Internal Revenue Service. An appellate conferee accepted the consent on behalf of of the consent and a statutory notice was subsequently mailed to petitioner. Held, respondent failed to prove circumstances of acceptance by the appellate conferee and the consent agreement between the parties will not be reformed to change the terms appearing on its face.…

1Opinion of the Court

ROY U. SCHENK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Schenk v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1249-75.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1976-363; 1976 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 39; 35 T.C.M. (CCH) 1652; T.C.M. (RIA) 760363;

November 30, 1976, Filed

Petitioner executed a special consent (Form 872-A) extending the period of limitation on assessment but altered it by providing that the consent would terminate upon notice by him to the Commissioner. Petitioner did not attempt to mislead the Internal Revenue Service. An appellate conferee accepted the consent on behalf of of the consent and a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Robinson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Anthony v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  5. Concrete Engineering Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mark Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Karen C. Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Stocker Resources, Inc. v. Assessment Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Buchine v. C.I.R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Buchine v. C.I.R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Huene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API