Dorr-Oliver Inc. v. Fluid-Quip, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONLON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dorr-Oliver Inc. (“Dorr-Oliver”) sues defendants Fluid-Quip, Inc. (“Fluid-Quip”), Andrew Franko (“Franko”) and Pic Tek, Inc. (“Pie Tek”) (collectively “defendants”) for trade dress and trademark infringement. Defendants move for summary judgment and partial summary judgment. Dorr-Oliver moves (1) to reopen discovery relating to the advice of counsel defendants rely upon in their motion for partial summary judgment; and (2) to extend its time to respond to defendants’ summary judgment motions.
BACKGROUND
Dorr-Oliver and Fluid-Quip both…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sands, Taylor & Wood Company v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alliance Bank v. New Century BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Claffey v. River Oaks HyundaiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Claffey v. River Oaks Hyundai, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Crystal Derrick v. Hoffman-La Roche LTD,et alDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019