Legal Opinion

Dorr-Oliver Inc. v. Fluid-Quip, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 4, 1993No. 93 C 842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dorr-Oliver Inc. (“Dorr-Oliver”) sues defendants Fluid-Quip, Inc. (“Fluid-Quip”), Andrew Franko (“Franko”) and Pic Tek, Inc. (“Pie Tek”) (collectively “defendants”) for trade dress and trademark infringement. Defendants move for summary judgment and partial summary judgment. Dorr-Oliver moves (1) to reopen discovery relating to the advice of counsel defendants rely upon in their motion for partial summary judgment; and (2) to extend its time to respond to defendants’ summary judgment motions.

BACKGROUND

Dorr-Oliver and Fluid-Quip both…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Sands, Taylor & Wood Company v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alliance Bank v. New Century BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Claffey v. River Oaks HyundaiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Claffey v. River Oaks Hyundai, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Crystal Derrick v. Hoffman-La Roche LTD,et alDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API