People v. Godreality Way
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the prosecution failed to present legally sufficient evidence of his guilt of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecu*965tion (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that on three separate occasions the defendant knowingly and unlawfully sold narcotic drugs upon the grounds of a child day care center under circumstances which evinced his knowledge that the sales were taking…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RedmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. ShaulovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.