Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Trend Community Health Services

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided June 27, 2000No. 1:99CV37-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

COGBURN, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The court has carefully considered the well-reasoned briefs of respective counsel and determined that genuine is sues of material fact remain on the Title VII claim.

On a motion for summary judgment, the moving party has the burden of production to show that there are no genuine issues for trial. Upon the moving party’s meeting that burden, the nonmoving party has the burden of persuasion to establish that there is a genuine issue for trial.

When the moving party has carried…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  2. Royster v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API