United States v. Pascual
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant Minerva Pascual appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, of conspiring to import and distribute cocaine and her resulting sentence to ten years’ imprisonment. 1 Pascual argues principally that the district court erred in: (1) not suppressing evidence seized from her car; (2) declining to give a “missing witness” instruction; and (3) admitting into evidence cell-site records obtained pursuant to a subpoena. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
A. Search of Pascual’s Car
Pascual first…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. CaraballoDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- United States v. LambisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Smartphone Geolocation Data ApplicationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Cucuta v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. AshburnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.