Legal Opinion

United States v. Pascual

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 2012No. 11-2988-crUnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant Minerva Pascual appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, of conspiring to import and distribute cocaine and her resulting sentence to ten years’ imprisonment. 1 Pascual argues principally that the district court erred in: (1) not suppressing evidence seized from her car; (2) declining to give a “missing witness” instruction; and (3) admitting into evidence cell-site records obtained pursuant to a subpoena. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

A. Search of Pascual’s Car

Pascual first…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. CaraballoDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. United States v. LambisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. In re Smartphone Geolocation Data ApplicationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Cucuta v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. United States v. AshburnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API