Legal Opinion

Bautista v. Spaulding

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01688Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEONARDO BAUTISTA, : Petitioner : : No. 1:22-cv-01688 v. : : (Judge Kane) STEPHEN SPAULDING, : Respondent : MEMORANDUM Pro se Petitioner Leonardo Bautista (“Petitioner”) has commenced the above-captioned action by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(“Section 2241”). He asserts that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has wrongfully denied him federal time credits under the First Step Act of 2018 (“First Step Act”). Because Petitioner failed to exhaust his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. MoscatoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. James Callwood v. Jerry Enos , Director, Bureau of Correction Chesley Roebuck, Chairman of V.I. Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API